WASHINGTON — The U.S. Authorities Accountability Workplace within the coming months will study “proper to restore” points involving the auto trade, the congressional watchdog confirmed Wednesday.
In an electronic mail to Automotive Information, spokesman Chuck Younger mentioned the workplace accepted a request final week to check the subject and plans to start the trouble in about six months “when related employees full different work and grow to be out there.”
The motion comes after Rep. Jan Schakowsky urged the GAO to look at “federal companies’ efforts to make sure customers’ proper to restore” with respect to light-duty vehicles and vans.
The Illinois Democrat requested the GAO to check how federal companies would possibly stability issues comparable to “addressing cybersecurity dangers that could be related to higher entry to automobile information and whether or not know-how exists to make sure each information entry and cybersecurity protections,” in keeping with a letter despatched June 6 to GAO Comptroller Normal Gene Dodaro.
Schakowsky additionally pressed the GAO to look into the effectiveness of the auto trade’s self-regulation and the way it has saved tempo with advances in know-how in addition to the competitiveness of the automobile restore market within the U.S.
The Home lawmaker additionally requested for suggestions to different federal companies to make sure customers’ proper to restore based mostly on the GAO’s research of the difficulty.
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most main automakers within the U.S., mentioned it welcomes the extra research.
“Proper now, most post-warranty work — 70 p.c — is finished by the impartial aftermarket,” the alliance mentioned in a press release. “In reality, the [Federal Trade Commission] has cited the automotive trade as a optimistic instance of the market working effectively.”
Schakowsky, within the letter, argues a 2014 memorandum of understanding between automakers and impartial garages and retailers “predated the usage of telematics to wirelessly transmit automobile information to producers.”
“The info transmitted to producers contains these used for diagnostic and restore functions — probably undermining the trade’s self-regulation of proper to restore by way of the 2014 memorandum,” she wrote.
In February, U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ailing., launched a invoice mandating that automobile house owners and impartial restore outlets have the identical entry to restore and upkeep instruments and information as automakers and their franchised dealerships.
Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Mondaire Jones, D-N.Y., even have every launched right-to-repair laws.
Rush’s invoice is just like a controversial poll measure in Massachusetts that was enacted by voters in 2020. The measure expands the prevailing right-to-repair regulation and requires makers of automobiles offered within the state to equip automobiles that use telematics programs with a standardized, open-access information platform, starting with the 2022 mannequin 12 months. It additionally offers automobile house owners and impartial restore outlets entry to real-time info from the telematics, comparable to crash notifications, distant diagnostics and navigation.
In an ongoing authorized battle with Massachusetts Lawyer Normal Maura Healey, the alliance has argued that the state’s amended proper to restore regulation conflicts with a number of federal legal guidelines, poses cybersecurity and automobile security dangers and units an inconceivable timeline for compliance.
U.S. District Choose Douglas Woodlock is anticipated to problem a ruling on the case by July 1.